home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: pathway1.pathcom.com!ts5l5
- From: insystem@pathcom.com (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: software emulated 16550!!! Is the money safed worth it ??
- Date: 18 Feb 1996 17:56:39 GMT
- Organization: InSystems Technologies Inc.
- Message-ID: <4g7p8n$9pv@pathway1.pathcom.com>
- References: <4g0elc$l5g@norm.uoknor.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts2l10.pathcom.com
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <4g0elc$l5g@norm.uoknor.edu>,
- bwee@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu (BoonKhim Wee) wrote:
- > I saw an ad selling a 28.8 Rockwell internal
- > modem for $100. But it deosnt have a 16550 chip in it.
- > It does software emulation! I have a Supra 14.4i right now
- > that uses the 16450 to emulate the 16550 too! Is it a
- > good deal to save on it? Or maybe, it really deosn't matter!
- > Does anyone have any opinion. FYI, I have a 486-33DX only.
-
- I am not 100% sure what is going on here, but the buffering functionality of a
- 16550A UART _cannot_ be emulated in software that runs on your computer
- because the overrun problem is caused by the CPU's inability to fetch the data
- as it arrives... and, therefore, any software running on that CPU will still
- have that problem. A 16450 UART is functionally identical to an 8250.
-
- HOWEVER,
-
- The 16550A is not the only possible cure to the overrun problem! In
- particular, I have heard of a Rockwell PC-internal chipset which implements
- the PC interface by setting up registers that look like an 8250 UART but are
- in fact merely latches for communication between your computer's CPU and the
- controller CPU in the modem. In this case, the firmware on the modem
- controller might be able to offer buffering equivalent to - or superior to -
- that of a 16550A UART... even while the interface looks like a plain 8250.
-
- Geoffrey Welsh, Developer, InSystems Technologies Inc.: insystem@pathcom.com
- At home: geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff
-